LAW112: Introduction to the Australian Legal System Essay Assignment help
Question
LAW112: This is a Charles Sturt University assignment in which the student is required to critically examine the idea of reconciliation between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians. The student is supposed to demonstrate that they are able to organize and implement legal research methodologies, which depicts their learnings from the module concepts and theories. As this essay-based assessment demands the student to thoroughly read and understand the different aspects of the Australian legal system, many students face difficulty in completing this essay. OAS provides high-quality LAW112 Essay Assignment Help for students pursuing a Bachelor of Law at CSU.
Solution
In providing Australian Law Assignment Help, our experts have written a comprehensive essay discussing Australia’s reconciliation of its indigenous and non-indigenous populations. As per the task file, the assessment is divided into three parts- an Introduction, a Discussion, and a brief Conclusion.
Introduction
Through this LAW112 Essay Assignment Help provided by our experts, our experts have structured the essay as per the guidance provided in the assessment file. The first section of the essay is a brief overview of the idea of reconciliation between the indigenous and non-indigenous populations. Additionally, the stance taken to assist in this reconciliation has also been briefly highlighted here.
Reconciliation is one of the major areas of concerns in Australia due to various problems faced by indigenous communities. To overcome these problems, several reconciliation attempts have been made and one such is the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Overall, the statement of Jens Korff is true because to create reconciliation, reaching a harmonious and equitable state is important which will further foster equality, equity, unity, and integrity in the future.11 Currently, indigenous communities are at a disadvantage and for reconciliation removing this disadvantage is important. Therefore, this essay is aimed at critically analysing the concept of reconciliation between indigenous and non-indigenous people in Australia. Reconciliation is the restoration of friendly relations between indigenous and nonindigenous people in Australia.2
If you want to buy Law Assignment help in Australia, WhatsApp us at +447700174710 today!
Discussion
The following section discusses the idea of reconciliation thoroughly, Australia’s historical treatment of Aboriginal peoples, and the modern reconciliation approach taken by our experts here. This approach has been chosen using extensive research of relevant credible resources, which is how our experts provide the best Charles Sturt University Assignment Help in Australia.
In terms of socio-economic aspects, the Indigenous and Aboriginal community of Australia has always been at a disadvantage. However, this disadvantage was further deepened and broadened by the legal system of the country and the leading examples of this are the Aborigines Protection Act (1909) NSW and the Aborigines Protection Amending Act 1915 (NSW). Aborigines Protection Act was aimed at protecting the rights and interests of aboriginal people by focusing on child welfare, employment, and support of the aboriginal people and removing socioeconomic inequalities.4 As such, it was the intention of the legislation to provide education, employment and social security to Aboriginal people. Along with this, the supply of liquor was prohibited.5 Moreover, Aborigines Protection Act prompted the removal of Aboriginal people from their town. Children were removed from their families on the grounds that aboriginal children are being neglected. It also permitted to take Aboriginal children aged between 14 to 18 years under apprenticeship.6 Following the passing of the Aborigines Protection Amending Act 1915 (NSW), more control by the Aboriginals Protection Board was levied.7 This act supported the removal of Aboriginal children from their families under any circumstances, seeking the interest of moral and physical well-being of the child. This cruel act was just a scheme to take children prisoners and use them as slaves without having to pay wages. As a result of this, approximately tens of thousands of children were taken away from their families and both children and families suffered mental illnesses like depression and sadness.8 Several studies have already confirmed that the real intent of this act was to gain control over the life and region of Indigenous communities, which it succeeded in achieving to some extent.9 Moreover, instead of promotion equality, it fostered social discrimination among indigenous and non-indigenous people. Furthermore, this has shaped a perception among Indigenous people that Australian Criminal and Justice System do not serve justice to them. This clearly implies that this law not only widened the gap between indigenous and non-indigenous community in Australia, it also encouraged them to voluntarily disintegrate themselves from the Australian society.
Similarly, despite advancement in time, there was not a major difference in the legal system for the rights and equality of the indigenous communities. One such example of this is the Aboriginal and Torress Strait Islanders Act 1965.11 The Aboriginal and Torress Strait Islanders Act 1965 was still aiming for the compulsory removal of people including children and preventing family members from living together.11 The extent of cruelty against indigenous people can be estimated by 105 regulations within this act which were aimed at implementing varied behavioural control ranging from committing discipline related offence, failure in maintaining hygiene, and escape from reserves.11 This act was repealed in 70s with the introduction of the Aborigines Act 1971 and Torress Strait Islanders Act 1971.11 Altogether, because of the abuse faced by indigenous communities, the problem of intergenerational trauma is persistent in these communities. Apart from affecting their physical and mental well-being, this intergenerational trauma has also negatively affected the ability of indigenous people to actively and positively participate in their communities and personal lives.
Get Law Assignment Help in Bathurst from top-quality PhD experts. Book your assignment by giving us a call at +61 871501720.
Conclusion
Lastly, the position on the possibility of genuine reconciliation between Australian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people has been summarised by our experts. You can read a snippet of the complete conclusion here.
Overall, from the above presented discussion, it is clear that Australia still needs to work a lot in order to reach reconciliation. Australia has a history of continuously putting the indigenous community at a disadvantage and therefore for reconciliation, it is required to end this disadvantage.
Order Australian Law Assignment Help from subject matter experts at discounted prices. It’s our seasonal discount season. Hurry! Reach out to us at onlineassignmentservices1@gmail.com.
