GSBS6380: Health Economics & Finance Report Critique Assignment Help
Question
GSBS6380: This Health Economics & Finance assignment for the University of Newcastle Australia requires the students to critically analyze and appraise a particular published paper which they need to select from the papers provided in the assignment. This critical appraisal should include a summary of the published paper in addition to highlighting the main focus of the study. Additionally, the evidence used, the study design, and the tools used for the study also need to be evaluated which should form the foundation for the critical appraisal. Students need to remark on the findings of the study and their validity as well.
Solution
The solution incorporates a comprehensive critical appraisal of the study- “Did the Junk Food Tax Make the Hungarians Eat Healthier?” published in the journal Food Policy in 2015 (Bíró, 2015).
The solution is divided into the following sections:
Summary of the paper and the question it addresses, Level of evidence and design of the study, Tools used to assess the critical appraisal, Critical appraisal, and lastly a brief conclusion.
Summary of the paper and the question it addresses
The solution begins by providing a summary of what the published paper is about. Additionally, the central question addressed in the study is also highlighted here. Our experts ensure that this section does not seem repetitive of the paper, but provides a reflective and critical view of the paper.
The leading causes of morbidity and death in Hungary are NCDs. One of the significant mortality rates in the industrialised world is ischemic heart disease, followed by stroke and cancers (Vokó et al., 2014). Hungary’s average amount of salt consumed per person is the highest in the entire European region, and almost two-thirds of the adult population is overweight or obese. The Hungarian ministry has made significant efforts recently to enhance citizen nutrition. Regulations to ensure nutrition requirements in public catering, banning trans fats in food items, improving the nutritional value of cafeterias in schools, and implementing the public health product tax are a few examples of efforts. Taxes are a potent tool for reducing the intake of harmful foods and beverages, which would benefit health (Mytton et al., 2014). There is a contract in the relevant experimental research, according to Epstein et al. (2012), that variations in the consumption of particular foods can be influenced by tax or subsidy programmes.
Want to know more about what the paper is about? Reach out to us at onlineassignmentservices1@gmail.com.
Level of evidence and design of the study
The next section presents a critical remark on the evidence that supports the findings of the study as well as a critical analysis of the research design used in the study.
The information for this cross sectional study was collected from a large-scale household panel data set. Information from the Hungarian Household Budget and Living Standard Survey was used by the author. The Hungarian Central Statistical Office conducts the sample survey, which has been running since 2009 in its present format. The statistics presented here belong to the years 2008 to 2012.
This is only 50% of the solution. To know more, WhatsApp us at +447956859420.
Tools used to assess the critical appraisal
In the next section, our experts have elaborated on what tools were used for undertaking this critical appraisal. This provides credible support to the appraisal while also demonstrating in-depth knowledge about the key arguments proposed in the solution.
The article is critically appraised according to the Critical appraisal checklist for public health and introductory guidelines for published research (Fowkes & Fulton, 1991; Heller et al., 2008). This checklist includes components related to public health. A different approach may be needed for the critical evaluation of publications on public health issues compared to papers that address clinical subjects.
If you also need assistance with your critical appraisal assignment, don’t hesitate to WhatsApp us at +447700174710.
Critical appraisal
This section constitutes the main part of the solution. Our experts have written the critical appraisal by systematically examining the reliability and validity of the study. You can read a snippet of this section below.
The study’s findings imply that taxing particular junk food categories may help the public’s eating habits, particularly those of lower income groups. This is founded on statistically solid, although moderately quantitative, proof that processed food intake decreased after Hungary introduced a levy on unhealthy foods. Such dietary changes will probably positively impact our health over the long term. The author responds to these concerns by examining the consumption impacts of a novel taxation policy and looking at expenses across a range of goods and services, not just those subject to the junk food tax. This article is innovative in using extensive family data to evaluate the purchasing effects of the unhealthy food tax in Hungary. The author solely examined the impact of the junk food tax on the intake of food containing high salt and sugar due to data restrictions, leaving out the information on drinks with a high sugar or caffeine content. Furthermore, it is impossible to accurately quantify the tax policy’s health consequences due to the data’s brief duration span and the confounding impacts of other factors. Except for taxes on “sweets and salt,” it is not always clear whether these replacement effects will be advantageous or detrimental from a nutritional standpoint. Considerations in this regard include whether these impacts will increase or worsen people’s adequacy in various macro- and micronutrients and how these effects vary between demographic groups with already low and high risk for malnutrition. According to some authors, Increased prices on unhealthy junk food should motivate consumers to choose fruits and vegetables and other healthier options, especially among younger folks (Diniz et al., 2016).
We have provided only a small section of the complete critical appraisal written by our experts. Please call us at +61 871501720 to get expert assistance for the complete solution.
Conclusion
Lastly, a brief conclusion is also provided in which our experts have suggested whether the study in the published paper is credible or whether it needs more research.
The main point of dispute during the implementation of the junk food tax was whether it was designed to lower the prevalence of obesity in the nation and alter public consumption patterns or whether it was meant to accomplish both. The addition of performance costs did not affect the overall ‘dominant’ result in this case because the junk food tax was judged to be cost-saving even when seen from the standpoint of the health system. Additionally, most of the tax load will gradually fall on the company’s side rather than the customer’s or vice versa if the demand curve is much more flexible than the supply curve. Considering the supply side, it is possible that manufacturers of the taxed junk food do not entirely pass on the cost of taxation to buyers.
Curious about whether the study is valid and reliable or not? Don’t hesitate to WhatsApp us at +447956859420.
